Some fiduciaries have skimmed summaries
of 404c and concluded that they are "safe" if the plan offers participants
at least three diversified investment choices, along with opportunity to make
frequent changes among them. However, the regulation clearly specifies that
participants also must have "sufficient information to make informed
investment choices." A subsequent Interpretative Bulletin issued by the
Department of Labor (96-1) clarifies what this means, as well as the potential
loss of 404c protection for companies that offer participant investment advice.
Here is a 404c compliance checklist:
Have all eligible participants been clearly informed that
the plan intends to comply with 404c?
Have participants been given the name, address and phone
number of the plan fiduciaries responsible for providing investment information?
Does the plan have a written Investment Policy Statement
(IPS) and does it explicitly state that the plan intends to comply with
404c?
Has the plan's annual Summary Plan Description been checked
against specific requirements of 404c? Has this process been documented
in the plan's compliance file? Have plan documents been reviewed by an ERISA
compliance attorney?
Does the plan have a published schedule of participant information
and education events? Is a document file maintained, containing copies of
all communications with plan participants? At every meeting with plan participants,
is a list of attendees recorded and filed?
Have any restrictions on transferring to or from an investment
choice been clearly communicated to participants?
Have all transaction fees and commissions that affect the
participant been disclosed? Specifically, have participants been given a
description of the annual operating expenses of each designated investment
alternative?
The DOL has defined four specific categories of participant
communication that do not constitute "investment advice" for purposes
of limiting 404c protection. They are:
1) plan information
2) general financial and investment information
3) asset allocation models
4) interactive investment materials, such as worksheets, PC illustrations,
etc. The common denominator of all four is that they don't steer the participant
in any particular investment direction. Does the plan's investment advice
meet this test?
If an asset allocation model identifies a specific investment
alternative available under the plan, have participants been advised that
investment alternatives with similar risk and return characteristics also
are available?
If calculators are used in investor education, are they based
on generally accepted investment theories? Do they clearly disclose the
"what if" assumptions on which they are based, such as retirement
age, income levels, inflation rates, rates of return, and all plan investment
alternatives?
Has the plan taken a survey of participants to determine
their level of investment knowledge? Are plan communications written in
a style and language that participants can clearly understand?
Are plan fiduciaries aware of specific duties that may not
be delegated or protected under 404c, including prudent selection and monitoring
of investment menu choices?
Does the plan have a formal process for evaluating investment
managers' adherence to fund objectives, including a written evaluation report?
Does the plan have fiduciary liability insurance from a carrier
such as American International Group (AIG); Lloyd's of London, Reliance
Insurance, Travelers Property Casualty, or Chubb Executive Risk? The cost
of this coverage typically is about 5% of the coverage limit purchased -$25,000
per year for a $5 million policy. Premiums can double or triple for participant-directed
plans that offer either of two investment choices:
1)company stock
2)a self-directed brokerage option.
Securities
offered through ING Financial Partners, Inc., member SIPC. Benico
is not a subsidiary of or controlled by ING FP.
Licensed to sell insurance in these states.